The consistency rule punishes skill. We replaced it.
Most evaluation programs cap how much any single session can contribute to your total simulated P&L. We break down exactly how that rule works, why it backfires on skilled traders, and what we do instead.
The "consistency rule," in one sentence.
Most evaluation programs cap the share that any single trading day can contribute to your total simulated P&L — commonly between 15% and 30%. Cross the line and the result is the same: evaluation void, regardless of how many other days were green.
Same total result. Same skill. One trader is told they passed, the other is told to start over — because the cap rewards distribution, not performance.
It forces you to stop your winners.
Every textbook says the same thing: cut losers short, let winners run. The consistency rule says the opposite. The moment a single position grows large enough to push that day past the concentration cap, the rule forces an early exit — turning a clean +5R idea into a clipped +1R scratch.
Skill that should compound gets capped at the worst possible moment: the moment it's working.
If your simulated position grows past the daily concentration limit, the rule forces an early close — even when the setup is still working. 80% of the move is left on the table.
The portion shaded in red on day 4 is simulated P&L the cap won't let the trader keep — even though every individual setup was sound.
It caps the size of your best winning day.
The percentage cap doesn't just affect one trade — it ceilings the total simulated P&L any single session can post. Three setups that all work on the same day can't all be banked. Whatever sits above the concentration line counts against the evaluation, regardless of how clean each individual entry was.
The trader is forced to size down their best ideas on their best days — not because the market said so, but because the metric did.
The penalty compounds when you're winning.
Most evaluation dashboards quietly track a rolling "consistency score." Every day with a larger-than-average result pushes it up. Win cleanly enough to climb the leaderboard and the score climbs faster than your equity — until it crosses the line and the evaluation is voided.
Said plainly: under this rule, the punishment for being skilled is structurally identical to the punishment for being reckless.
Win too often and the score creeps up. By day 8, the trader is in breach — not for losing, but for winning at the wrong cadence.
We removed the concentration cap. We didn't replace it with another trap.
Your best simulated day can be 100% of your P&L. We don't void evaluations for winning too well in one session.
Our consistency mechanism is a small, stated minimum number of trading days — varies by model, published up front, the same for every trader. No hidden math, no surprise math.
A single daily-loss cap and a single max-drawdown cap. Visible on your dashboard, the same for everyone.
Questions traders actually ask.
Do you have any kind of consistency rule? + –
No daily concentration cap. Our consistency mechanism is instead a small, posted minimum number of trading days that varies by model — alongside two clear risk caps (a daily simulated-loss limit and an overall simulated-drawdown limit). Every threshold is published in full and visible on your dashboard.
Why minimum days instead of a profit cap? + –
A profit cap measures consistency by ceilinging your best session — which punishes the trader who reads the market correctly. A minimum-days requirement measures consistency by participation over time, without ever capping how much simulated P&L a single day can generate. Your best day stays your best day.
How many minimum trading days, exactly? + –
It depends on the model — a handful of sessions, posted on each program's rule page before you start. It's the same number for every trader on that model, and it doesn't change mid-evaluation.
How do I see where I stand mid-evaluation? + –
Your dashboard shows live values for every rule that applies: daily loss used, max drawdown used, days elapsed, P&L. If you can see all four green, you're in good standing — no other criterion runs in the background.
Let your best day be your best day.
Run our evaluation under risk rules that read the same to every trader, every day. No concentration cap. No hidden minimum sessions. No silent score running in the background.
Start your evaluation →